When Buddhas wheel started
turning
It was then that the fourth colour
On India’s tricolor emerged as never before
And the sound of shoeless feet
Was heard as music
Like never before.
Benoy.P.J.
One of Raju Patel's basic innovations in
the set of paintings exhibited here is his strategy of beginning with a tonally
altered and slightly muddied set of basic colours. It is, one could say, the
sign of the bhoomi sparsa that he has had, as a luminal being who has had
occasion to experience life on an other plane. The yellow, the red, the blue or
green that he work with are no more the same as those that are available
readily on a European colour card. Neither are the people or objects that he
depict in any way ‘fine’. But to him their everyday lives and tribulations are worthy of a micro level attention and
contemplation and a splendid source of spiritual and material plenitude that
comes from a long tradition of joyous and godly existence. From his early days
in Baroda, his works have exhibited a micro level consciousness about otherness
and its earthly presence. As a person who has a slightly different body
structure, and a slightly removed social address, he was able to fabulate these
perceived distances from a benignly earthly and unadulterated spiritual
position, without undue greediness and a simplicity that came from the heart of
darkness. The art seldom was pretensive or high brow in its demeanour, and
always exhibited the subtle awareness that it would have to shave of its brow
if it did so. This did not come from a lack of training, skill or academic know
how, but from a heightened consciousness that the ‘genealogy’ of the visual was
not one that traced its ‘lineage’ through art works connected to one another,
but that found its material from the entire universe of visual repertory of the
infinite which it held with a certain wonder and humility. It refused to accept
for truth the secondary status that the canons would confer it, because it was connected
to the underground flows of a thousand rivers, and the flights and elevations
of the hawks eye. It knew the worldly crawl of a snake as well as its many
dances, because it had travelled its distances with its belly against the
earth. The ‘Naga’ and the ‘naka’ ( Paradise) were never entirely separated for
him, because he also was connected by streams of blood to people everywhere. In
the early works one would come across a pair of shoes that was made specially
for him, with erotically inserted laces and movements that happened beneath the
surface, something that was easily visible for another of his kind, but almost
invisible for the gaze of pomp. In it there was a litany for the differently-
enabled, a noble disregard for the hegemonic
and condescendingly upturned noses of contemporary art. There was also a
sense of the non representational, because it refused to fall in with the
taboos both on abstraction and representation. The kid as well as the old woman
has a presence in it, and it was aware of its many absences, calling them forth
elsewhere, wherever and whenever it was necessary. A little object like a small
hand pump for spraying poison on mosquitos or bed bugs was significant enough
for it, not because of some quest for a false pretense of microcosmic non
aggression which brahminical purism tried to put in place, but due to a cosmic
sense of interconnectedness, and brotherhood. No little being was to be
entirely eradicated to facilitate for human
medical touchiness, for the world had always had a larger logic and
everything in it had its own worth. The skin was dark and brown in the sun,
except in those who had succumbed to the pathological logic of dis-ease. The
works have a certain ease and the people, a robust life that the inquisitive glasses
and anal- eyes of materialist history couldn’t meet, and ears in which the wind
played its tune, and the turning of Buddhas wheel , the many bodhisatwas, and
the womanly presences of earth and nature that embraced his creed. There was also a hand on the shoulder of the unseen
that a dog on leash would fail to smell. The scooterist’s noisy and smokey ride was very well there, as well as its
‘civilizational’ jargon, and its amnesias, there for a careful observer to
perceive. One could see that the woman was carrying a bag in each hand, similar
in its posture to V.V. Vinu’s self portrait with plastic bags, or to a Raghunathan’s pompous and sarcastic retort to it. It held
both its material and human presence with a certain respect and regard, and saw
through the avante -garde gambit of a high brow sarcasm directed at the
commons. As an academically trained artist from a tribal background, Raju bhai
could easily see through the prescriptive formulas that were attempting to
stifle the art of a tribal, and could still establish a certain connection to
the painting of Jangar Singh or Anand Singh Shyam, where it painted an aircraft
or a car around which birds or semi -beings were left to linger. The stylistic
‘realism’ of the painting was a thin
veneer within which the kineticism of other lives was expressing itself,
shrouded in a certain mystery. A Ramesh Tekam would probably recognize in it
certain continuities and distinctions, though not the ones that a
Bourdeiu’s “Distinctions” would point out. You may not find in it
Buribhai’s , Nankhusia Vyam’s , Ramsingh
Urveti’s, jaydev Baghel’s or RajKumar’s
animals but still could perceive the vast emptinesses that have been left
without detail by a cruel and segregating urbanism, which have undertaken to
relegate the tribal to a life on the street side and in the slums, or turned
them into victims of ‘criminal’ nomenclatures, devalued and humiliated, as in
an ‘Uchalya’, which Raju bhai in his work undertakes to give details to. Being
aware of the ‘scales’ that human beings were judged by in Brahminism, by taking
recourse to an image from the movie ‘Freaks’, Rajubhai alludes subtly to the ‘ritual status’ of
dalits in the Purusha sukta (not obviously written by some woman) and Manu’s
memories which somehow had legalized the
violence of the urban pot holes (obviously housed by certain ‘allegators’ which some ‘Pomo’ Pynchon’s have dreaded, but
which were visible to ‘The man who lived Underground’). It could also carry the memories of a
prolific Dasharath, albeit in a certain realism, who maybe carrying a tiffin
somewhere in the background. Somewhere in them we can find an opening to the
contemporaneity of the middle path, refusing the machismo of futurism,
racism and Nazism and the rotten
puritanism of the feudatory classes.
BENOY .P.J